Post by anik4200 on Feb 18, 2024 7:08:16 GMT -5
Differentiated the rapporteur. For Toffoli, the appointment of judges to serve in the São Paulo Judiciary bodies upon registration, taking into account their professional history, is at odds with the constitutional rules that regulate the promotion and removal of judges. No problem Alexandre de Moraes, on the other hand, opined that the São Paulo Complementary Law 1,208/2013 is in accordance with the rules of the Federal Constitution. The minister stated that the rule does not violate the principle of irremovability of judges. After all, such a guarantee can be relativized for reasons of public interest, as long as there is a reasoned decision by the court or the CNJ, ensuring full defense — a procedure provided for by the complementary law of São Paulo. Furthermore, the rule does not disrespect the principle of natural justice, said Alexandre.
This postulate prohibits exceptional courts, but this is not the case, as the State Department of Criminal Executions and the State Department of Police Inquiries were created by law and only provide for trials by members of the Judiciary. Greater volume The departments were created by state Complementary Law 1,208/2013, regulated by Resolution 617/2013 of the Court of Justice of São Paulo. They must operate through regional units to be installed in the ten administrative headquarters of the TJ-SP, observing the criterion of greater volume of processes. The Attorney General's Office, author of the action, claims th Special Phone Number Data at the installation of departments only in the districts with the greatest procedural movement in the state violates the guarantees of broad access to Justice, broad defense and the efficiency of public administration. Representatives of the Brazilian Institute of Criminal Sciences (Ibccrim), the Institute for the Defense of the Right to Defense (IDDD) and the Public Defender's Office of São Paulo, who act as amici curiae , also spoke out in favor of the nullity of the model.
They maintain that the system violates the principle of irremovability, according to which the judge cannot be removed from the district in the name of guaranteeing impartiality. The São Paulo State Attorney's Office argued that, contrary to what was alleged by the PGR, the law meets the principle of efficiency and reasonable duration of the process, as it reduces the waiting time for prisoners to have their requests analyzed.Without category Last week, an interview with the President of the Republic caused concern in diplomatic circles denouncing alleged interference by the United States Department of Justice in the late "lava jet". The risk would be to transform a "conspiratorial" agenda into official government speech. Among experts on the subject, however, the interference of political and economic factors in anti-corruption processes in the USA is a well-known topic, and there is nothing conspiratorial about it.
This postulate prohibits exceptional courts, but this is not the case, as the State Department of Criminal Executions and the State Department of Police Inquiries were created by law and only provide for trials by members of the Judiciary. Greater volume The departments were created by state Complementary Law 1,208/2013, regulated by Resolution 617/2013 of the Court of Justice of São Paulo. They must operate through regional units to be installed in the ten administrative headquarters of the TJ-SP, observing the criterion of greater volume of processes. The Attorney General's Office, author of the action, claims th Special Phone Number Data at the installation of departments only in the districts with the greatest procedural movement in the state violates the guarantees of broad access to Justice, broad defense and the efficiency of public administration. Representatives of the Brazilian Institute of Criminal Sciences (Ibccrim), the Institute for the Defense of the Right to Defense (IDDD) and the Public Defender's Office of São Paulo, who act as amici curiae , also spoke out in favor of the nullity of the model.
They maintain that the system violates the principle of irremovability, according to which the judge cannot be removed from the district in the name of guaranteeing impartiality. The São Paulo State Attorney's Office argued that, contrary to what was alleged by the PGR, the law meets the principle of efficiency and reasonable duration of the process, as it reduces the waiting time for prisoners to have their requests analyzed.Without category Last week, an interview with the President of the Republic caused concern in diplomatic circles denouncing alleged interference by the United States Department of Justice in the late "lava jet". The risk would be to transform a "conspiratorial" agenda into official government speech. Among experts on the subject, however, the interference of political and economic factors in anti-corruption processes in the USA is a well-known topic, and there is nothing conspiratorial about it.