Post by account_disabled on Feb 20, 2024 2:09:06 GMT -5
The Provincial Court highlights in its ruling that, by virtue of the above, “ the contumacy and frequency with which the accused used public funds for expenses in brothels , sometimes of high amounts, which was also simultaneous with expenditures of resources, is evident. own in the aforementioned premises, even with coincidence of dates", which "is incompatible with the idea of the disposition of public funds on a temporary basis, since what the situation described shows is that, on the dates in question, the “The accused had an uncontrolled fondness for this type of establishment.”
In the case of Ana Valls, the Court condemns her for a crime of embezzlement, without applying the criminal continuity in relation to said crime, considering that "the only Fax Lists case in which it is proven that she has participated in an embezzlement act was on the day March 25, 2010 on the occasion of the signing and cashing of two checks for the amount of 6,300 euros charged to Faffe funds.”
When determining the penalties to be imposed, and in the case of the former director of the foundation , the Court takes into account “his personal circumstances , since apart from the members of the Board of Trustees, the accused was the top leader of the Faffe in his capacity as technical general director, in which the Board of Trustees made up of relevant members of the Autonomous Administration had delegated broad powers and therefore its utmost confidence."
To the above is added " the seriousness of the facts consisting of the persistent repetition of acts of appropriation of public funds over time , since if we add all the payments made through the foundation card on the days that have been declared proven, they add up to 40 payments, that is, 40 times that public funds were appropriated, making several payments in a single day, reaching up to nine payments in the same day.”
In the case of Ana Valls, the Court condemns her for a crime of embezzlement, without applying the criminal continuity in relation to said crime, considering that "the only Fax Lists case in which it is proven that she has participated in an embezzlement act was on the day March 25, 2010 on the occasion of the signing and cashing of two checks for the amount of 6,300 euros charged to Faffe funds.”
When determining the penalties to be imposed, and in the case of the former director of the foundation , the Court takes into account “his personal circumstances , since apart from the members of the Board of Trustees, the accused was the top leader of the Faffe in his capacity as technical general director, in which the Board of Trustees made up of relevant members of the Autonomous Administration had delegated broad powers and therefore its utmost confidence."
To the above is added " the seriousness of the facts consisting of the persistent repetition of acts of appropriation of public funds over time , since if we add all the payments made through the foundation card on the days that have been declared proven, they add up to 40 payments, that is, 40 times that public funds were appropriated, making several payments in a single day, reaching up to nine payments in the same day.”